Home > Bourgeoisie
The bourgeoisie is one of the wealthy classes into which a capitalist society is typically divided, according to certain western schools of economic thought, especially Marxism. The term is a French word derived from the Italian borghesia (from borgo, village, in turn from Greek pyrgos). A borghese, then, was a person who had a house in the center of a village.A bourgeois class emerged in medieval Italy, when the inhabitants of villages started to become wealthier than the people in the surrounding countryside. This gave them relatively more power and influence in society, moving them closer to the ruling classes and clergy, and further from the rural classes. The archetype of this mediaeval bourgeoisie was the mill owner, who rapidly acquired such great influence over the local economy that he was able to veto his prince.
In the following centuries, the term was better applied to define the first bankers and the people in developing activities such as tradeTrade centers on the exchange of goods and/or services. Exchanges may take place between two parties (bilateral trade) or amongst more than two parties (multilateral trade). In its original form trade necessarily used barter and the exchange of goods and and financeFinance is the application of the principles of financial economics to an inter-related set of monetary problems. Its aim is in the optimal use of financial instruments. In the case of a company, this generally involves balancing risk and profitability an.
1 The bourgeoisie in Marxist theory
In Marxist theory, the bourgeoisie is defined as that class in commodityA commodity has a different meaning in business than in Marxian political economy. For the former, it is a largely homogenous product, whereas for the latter, it is an item produced for exchange. Business Concept In the world of business, a commodity is a-producing capitalist society which owns the means of productionIn Marxist economics and its contemporary derivatives, the means of production refers to physical, non-human, inputs used in production. This includes factories, machines, and tools, along with both infrastructural capital and natural capital, the classic; the term is effecively the same as "capitalists." Marxism sees the proletariatThe proletariat (from Latin proles offspring) is a term used to identify a lower social class; a member of such a class is called a proletarian . Originally it was identified as those people who have no other wealth than their sons; the term was initially (wage-earners) and bourgeoisie as inherently opposed, since (for example) workers automatically wish wages to be as high as possible, while owners wish for wages (costs) to be as low as possible—in other words, capitalists exploitIn political economy, economics, and sociology, exploitation usually does not include simple theft, since the latter is not a persistent economic or social relationship, as when a pimp "exploits" his prostitute. Rather, exploitation involves some persiste the workers.
In the rhetoricRhetoric (from Greek ρητωρ, rhetor "orator") is one of the three original liberal arts or trivium (the other members are dialectic and grammar). While it has meant many different things during its 2500-year history, it is generally d of most radicalRadical is derived from the Latin word radix which means "pertaining to the root(s)". In various fields of endeavor, it can mean: in sociology: one who advocates thoroughgoing analysis or change "at the root" in politics: can refer to (an extremist) a sup Communist parties, "bourgeois" is an insult; those who are perceived to collaborate with the bourgeoisie are often called its lackeys.
If one only defines "owning the means of production" as a private individual having full, 100 percent control over a particular means of production, there are very few members of the bourgeoisie left in modern 21st century capitalist society. In contemporary Marxist parlance, bourgeoisie refers to those who control corporate institutions through majority share holdings, options, trusts, funds, intermediaries or by making public statements regarding market transactions. This sense harks back to the Marxist interpretation of "ownership" as involving control or class power. In these terms a "capitalist" would be someone whose wealth results predominantly from investments, and thus does not need to work to live. In modern non-Marxist common parlance, the terms bourgeoisie and proletariat now refer to the more general concepts of rich and poor, and not specifically to owning or not owning the means of production.
Classes are not homogenous entities, and many analysts make use of "sub-classes" which are used to sharpen the definition of a particular group. These divisions often make use of the terms: "high bourgeoisie," a group composed of the richest classes (industrialists, major traders, etc.); "middle bourgeoisie," owners of solid patrimonies or incomes, but less rich than the high bourgeoisie; and, "little bourgeoisie" ( petty bourgeoisie), composed of the independent entrepreneurs who hire few if any employees beyond their immediate families. For some, the petty bourgeoisie also includes members of the Marxian proletariat, while the " proletariat" then would be the remaining lowest class (the working poor). This version of the word bourgeoisie completely ignores the original focus of ownership of the means of production. This analysis is not common to all economists.
