Index: > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Home > Comparative advantage

In economics, the theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two countries to trade, even though one of them may be able to produce every kind of item more cheaply than the other. What matters is not the absolute cost of production, but rather the ratio between how easily the two countries can produce different kinds of things. It was first described by Robert Torrens in 1815 in an essay on the corn trade. He concluded that it was to England's advantage to trade various goods with Poland in return for corn, even though it might be possible to produce that corn more cheaply in England than Poland. However, it is usually attributed to David Ricardo who explained it clearly in his 1817 book The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation in an example involving England and Portugal. In Portugal it is possible to produce both wine and cloth with less work than it takes in England. However, the relative costs of producing those two goods are different in the two countries. In England it is very hard to produce wine, and only moderately difficult to produce cloth. In Portugal both are easy to produce. Therefore, while it is cheaper to produce cloth in Portugal than England, it is cheaper still for Portugal to produce excess wine, and trade that for English cloth. And conversely England benefits from this trade because its cost for producing cloth has not changed but it can now get wine at closer to the cost of cloth. Stanislaw Ulam once challenged Paul Samuelson to name one theory in all of the social sciences which is both true and nontrivial. Several years later, Samuelson responded with David Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage.

"That it is logically true need not be argued before a mathematician; that it is not trivial is attested by the thousands of important and intelligent men who have never been able to grasp the doctrine for themselves or to believe it after it was explained to them."—Paul Samuelson

Because the theory produces a counter-intuitive result, it may be useful to consider the following example:

Suppose there are two countries, Northland and Southland. Both have a wine-making industry and a clothing industry.

In Northland, it takes a worker 3 days to make a suit of clothes, and 5 days to make a bottle of wine.

Southland is more efficient in both industries – a Southlander can make a suit of clothes in 1 day or a bottle of wine in 1 day.

Southland has an "absolute advantage" in both industries – it is more productive at making both wine and clothes. However, it is 5 times more productive than Northland in wine making and only 3 times more productive than Northland in Clothes making. That is, it has a comparative advantage in wine making. While Northland is worse at making either kind of goods, it is least deficient at making clothes.

The price of goods must reflect the cost of making them, so it is likely that in Northland, a bottle of wine (takes 5 days work for a Northlander to make) costs more than a suit of clothes (takes only 3 days). As the Southlanders can make either wine or clothes at the same production cost, it is rational to export wine to Northland, and take the higher profit. Wine will be a better export than clothes for Southland as long as this is true, and it would be rational to deploy more resources into the wine industry at the expense of the clothes industry.

Suppose that the Southland clothes industry now collapses due to a labour (or capital) shortage caused by the boom in the wine industry. This might not worry the Southland Treasury – the Northlanders should be willing to pay more for wine than for clothes: until the price rises above 5:3, it will not be economic to reopen the Northland vineyards. Therefore a Southland worker can make wine, buy clothes and still be in profit. Provided the profit margin is enough, it is worth Southland trading wine for clothes with Northland, even though Southland imports goods that it could manufacture more efficiently itself. If Northland's clothes were to rise to more than the price fetched by wine, it would be time to re-open the Southland clothes factories.

Clearly this theoretical model omits several factors that sometimes apply in the real world: Workers and capital may not be able to be transferred painlessly from one industry to another. The clothing industry (in Southland) and wine-making industry (in Northland) may therefore exert political pressure (through industry associations and trades unions) to protect their industries. Governments also sometimes decide to provide subsidies or to erect import barriers to preserve domestic industries. Reasons other than political needs might include national prestige, or the wish to avoid being dependent on imports in case trade is disrupted – for example by war.

External links

International trade Free trade

Politics	Business	Finance

Topics: Comparative Advantage Wine Clothes Southland Northland Trade...

Comparative lawComparative law is the study of differences and similarities between the law of different countries and, more generally, of the different legal traditions, the common law tradition, the civil law tradition and the socialist law tradition. Several discipli	Comparative methodThe comparative method (in linguistics) is a method used to detecting genetic relationships between languages and to establish a consistent relationship hypothesis by reconstructing: the common ancestor of the languages in question, a plausible sequence o	Comparative military ranksThe military rank system is a means of categorizing the hierarchy of an armed force. This list compares the military ranks of various countries and organizations as currently in use. Officer Ranks For a comparison of major participants in the First and Se
Comparative advantageIn economics, the theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two countries to trade, even though one of them may be able to produce every kind of item more cheaply than the other. What matters is not the absolute cost of product	Comparative religionComparative religion is a field of religious study that analyzes interpretive differences of common themes and ideas among the world's religions. This field of study relies upon the examination of myth, deriving essential themes from religious metaphor, a	ComparativeIn grammar the comparative is the form of an adjective or adverb which denotes the degree or grade by which a person, thing, or other entity has a property or quality greater or less in extent than that of another. It is in fact, one of the two inflection
Comparative anatomy	Comparative literature	Comparative psychology
Comparative military ranks of World War II	Comparative military ranks of World War I	Comparative government
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)	Comparative statics	Comparative genomics

Non User