| Index: > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
|
|||||
In classical economics, "rent" referred to a specific kind of income received by the owners of land and other gifts of nature (natural resources) and was thus often called "land rent." To Karl Marx and Henry George, this land-rent was seen as a form of exploitation. Land-owners were able to get "something for nothing" just because they controlled such important natural resources. (To Marx, the land-owners received a part of capitalist society's surplus-value that was redistributed from the industrial sector, where workers produced it.)
Modern neoclassical economics has generalized this theory to suggest that the owner of any kind of input can receive economic rent due to unique qualities of that input. Rent is thus a payment received for special advantages of any sort. For example, an excellent professional basketball player typically earns much more income than is necessary to compensate him or her for the training, effort, practice, and the like needed to become a player. The payment may not always be in terms of money. It may also come in terms of the privileges of fame.
Because receiving a rent involves an individual or corporation getting "something for nothing", economists see them as investing in rent seeking activities, i.e. spending to get special privileges from the government or from market positions.