| Index: > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
|
|||||
| First Prev [ 1 2 3 ] Next Last |
From the perspective of a social planner or welfare economics, this will result in an outcome that is not socially optimal. From the perspective of anybody affected by the externality, it is either a negative factor in their lives (as with the perfume) or a boon (as with the other's pretty clothes). In the first case, the person who is affected by the negative externality (air pollution) will likely see it as violating his or her freedom to breathe freely. It might even be seen as trespassing on their lungs, violating their property rights. Thus, an external cost can easily pose an ethical or political problem. Alternatively, it might be seen as a case of poorly-defined property rights. An external benefit, on the other hand, may increase the availability of choices for -- and thus the amount of freedom of -- the beneficiaries with no cost to them. They may thus resist the ending of such beneficial externalities along with any associated inefficiencies.
The value of the effects of the externality are likely not something that can be easily calculated in a technocratic way by economists or social planners, since they reflect the ethical views and preferences of the entire population. Instead, for countries believing in popular sovereignty, some sort of democratic method is needed to attach values to the external costs and benefits.
Sometimes, externalities are called " neighborhood effects " or "spillovers" but it should not be thought that all externalities are small, spilling over only in the "neighborhood." For example, some claim that the burning of hydrocarbons affects the entire "neighborhood" of the Earth, encouraging global warming.
Examples of these kinds of externalities include:
In contrast:
Externalities are important in economics because they may lead to inefficiency (see Pareto efficiencyPareto efficiency or Pareto optimality is a central concept in game theory with broad applications in economics, engineering and the social sciences. A change that can make at least one individual better off, without making any other individual worse off). Because the producers of externalities do not have an incentive to take into account the effect of their actions on others, the outcome will be inefficient. There will be too much activity that causes negative externalities such as pollution, and not enough activity that creates positive externalities, relative to an optimal outcome. As noted, external costs also can imply political conflicts, rancorous lawsuits, and the like. This may make the problem of externalities too complex for the concept of Pareto optimality to handle.
Many of the most important externalities in the economy are concerned with pollution and the environment. See the article on environmental economicsEnvironmental economics is a subfield of economics concerned with environmental issues (other usages of the term are not uncommon). In using standard methods of economics, it is distinguished from green economics which subsumes the nonstandard approaches for more discussion of externalities and how they may be addressed in the context of environmental issues.