Home > Libertarian perspectives on interventionism
One philosophical dilemma within libertarianism is how 'negative rights' should be applied when thinking outside of the domestic sphere. For domestic policies, "minimal laws and mandates" deal with the citizen's relationship as a private participator directly with the government. That all individuals should be given the same freedom from government regulation doesn't mean that individuals are atomistic actors with no relationships to others.This can be taken to mean that freedom of pursuit for those given decision making power is seen as the same political egalitarianism that the nation's own libertarian stance allots for the civilians of the nation, being themselves civilians in pursuit of a station. Can act in accord to their judgment as appointed their office & as so long as it does not affect the sphere of the people in the nation, to take national initiative in foreign affairs, such as military interventionism toward non-libertarian nations, by the voluntary members of the armed forces, and not using any draft. This stance sees competition between all entities without mutually agreed mandates, deregulation, as both the economic & social purpose behind Libertarianism.
Or rather, in allowing a free hand to foreign nations to act as they will, no matter how anti-libertarian, and believing that it is a libertarian right of egalitarian political opportunity to give other systems freedom from any coercion on their behalf. Creating a right to the scope of one's own domestic ideals as already pertaining to others in a preventative way that disallows the government from partaking of any private initiative. This stance takes Libertarianism as being the spirit of anti-interventionism.
