 |
Business | Industries | Finance | Tax |
| Index: > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
|
|||||
A person taking an oath indicates this in a number of ways. The most usual is the explicit "I swear," but any statement or promise that includes "with N as my witness" or "so help me N," with N being something or someone the oath-taker holds sacred, is an oath. Many people take an oath by holding in their hand or placing over their head a book of scripture or a sacred object, thus indicating the sacred witness through their action. However, the chief purpose of such an act is for ceremony or solemnity, and the act does not of itself make an oath.
There is confusion between oaths and other statements or promises. The current Olympic Oath, for instance, is really a pledge and not properly an oath since there is only a "promise" and no appeal to a sacred witness. Oaths are also confused with vows, but really a vow is a special kind of oath.
In law, oaths are made by a witness to a court of law before giving testimony and usually by a newly appointed governmentA government is an organization that has the power to make and enforce laws for a certain territory. There are several definitions on what exactly constitutes a government. The government has been defined as the dominant decision-making arm (the policy el officerAny holder of an office or of a post may bear the title officer . Generally, the word officer implies a rank, and degree of decision-making responsibility, higher rather than lower in a chain of command and reporting. However, in some organizations that u to the people of a stateThis article discusses states as sovereign political entities. For other meanings, see state (disambiguation). In international law and international relations, a state is a political entity possessing sovereignty, i. not being subject to any higher polit before taking office. In both of those cases, though, an affirmationAn affirmation (from Latin affirmare to assert) is the declaration that something is true. In logic, an affirmation is a positive judgment, the union of the subject and predicate of a proposition. In law, an affirmation is a solemn declaration allowed to can be usually substituted. A written statement, if the author swears the statement is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, is called an affidavitAn affidavit is a formal sworn statement of fact, written down, signed, and witnessed (as to the veracity of the signature) by a taker of oaths, such as a notary public. The name is Medieval Latin for he has declared upon oath''. One use of affidavits is. The oath given to support an affidavit is frequently administered by a notary publicA notary public is an officer who can administer and give oaths, and perform certain other acts varying from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. History The office of notary dates back to the Roman Empire. Prior to the enactment of the Ecclesiastical Licences A who will memorialize the giving of the oath by affixing her seal to the document. Breaking an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is perjuryPerjury is lying or making verifiable false statements under oath in a court of law. Perjury is a crime because the witness has sworn to tell the truth, and for the credibility of the court, witness testimony must be relied on as being truthful. It is see.
Other famous oaths include:
Various religious groups have objected to the taking of oaths, most notably the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) and the Mennonites. This is principally based on the words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount: "I say to you: 'Swear not at all'" ( Matthew 5:34). Jesus says that we should hold ourselves to a high standard of truthfulness at all times: "yes" should mean "yes", "no" should mean "no", and there is no need for elaborate formal promises. Not all Christians follow this reading, because there are other Biblical statements which mention oaths without condemning them.
Opposition to oath-taking caused many problems for these groups throughout their history. Quakers were frequently imprisoned because of their refusal to swear loyalty oaths. Testifying in court was also difficult. George Fox famously challenged a judge who had asked him to swear, saying that he would do so once the judge could point to any Bible passage where Jesus or his apostles took oaths. (The judge could not, but this did not allow Fox to escape punishment.) Legal reforms from the eighteenth century onwards mean that everyone in the United Kingdom now has the right to make an affirmation instead of an oath. The United States has permitted affirmations since it was founded; they are even mentioned in the Constitution.
Because of this new legal situation, a few Quakers now believe that there is no real difference between an oath and an affirmation, other than the word used. Consequently, they refuse even to affirm using a set phrase.
See also:
| Politics | Business | Finance |
 |
 |
 |
|