| Index: > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
|
|||||
In Karl Popper's definition, found in his two-volume book The Open Society and Its Enemies, he defines an "open society" as one which ensures that political leaders can be overthrown without the need for bloodshed, as opposed to a "closed society", in which a bloody revolution or coup d'état is needed to change the leaders. Democracies are examples of the "open society", whereas totalitarian dictatorships and autocratic monarchies are examples of the "closed society".
The Popperian concept of the open society stems from his philosophy of science. Since no one has the perfect knowledge on the perfect government, the next best thing is a government that is ready to change the politics it runs. An open society also has to be pluralistic and multicultural, in order to benefit from the maximum number of viewpoints possible to the given problems.
Open society advocates most often see the civil society as the engine of the evolution of the open society.
Many contemporary libertarians find the idea of the open society close to them. Their idea of a night-watchman state and an even stronger emphasis on the civil society instead of a government contrasts with Popper's original view of a liberal democracyLiberal democracy is a form of representative democracy where elected representatives that hold the decision power are moderated by a constitution that emphasizes protecting individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as freedom of.