| Index: > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
|
|||||
A useful psychological measure must be both valid (actually tests what is claims to test) and reliable (does it consistently).
IQ tests and academic achievement tests are designed to be administered to either an individual (by a trained evaluator) or to a group of people (paper and pencil tests). The individually-administered tests tend to be more comprehensive, more reliable, more valid and generally to have better psychometric characteristics than group-administered tests. Of course, individually-administered tests are more expensive to administer because of the need for a trained administrator ( psychologist, school psychologist , or psychometrician ), and the limitation of working with just one person.
They are typically used to assess impairment after an injury or illness known to affect neurocognitive functioning, or when used in research, to measure differences in certain neuropsychological abilities between experimental groups.
Psychological tests of personality function generally fall into the two broad categories of objective tests and projective tests. Objective tests have a restricted response format, such as allowing for true or false answers. A prominent example of an objective personality test would be the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Projective tests allow for a much freer type of response. An example of this would be the Rorschach test, in which a person states what they see in ink blots on ten cards.
There is considerable controversy regarding the value and validity of projective testing. Nevertheless, both types of tests continue to be used in modern psychological practice.
Types of personality tests include the Rorschach test, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, and the Thematic Apperception Test. Critics have pointed to the Forer effectThe Forer effect (also called the Barnum effect after P. Barnum) is an effect based on self-validation of personality descriptions, where an individual gives a high rating to a positive description that supposedly applies specifically to himself. In fact to suggest that some of these appear to be more accurate and discriminating than the really are.
Psychometrics